Home / Compliance / Standard 3 review the last order of business for FASEA

Standard 3 review the last order of business for FASEA


The soon-to-be-disbanded Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) is finishing its reign with a flurry, announcing a review of the much-derided conflicts of interest Standard 3 of the recently enshrined law.

  • Financial advisers and legal experts have raised concerns about the structure of the ethical standards sincetheir inception. In fact FASEA had received 37 submissions to its code of ethics guidance, the majority of which had pointed to the urgent need to refine the wording of Standard 3. The result is that the last order of business for the year has been to put the wording up for review and accept submissions from the broader sector before proposing any amendments.

    Commenting on the proposal, FASEA said: “Standard 3 received particular comment with a broad range of suggestions made including [to] retain the standard as is, incorporate the wording and intent from the draft guide into the standard to give it legal application, incorporate a reasonable person and materiality test into the standard, revert to the original wording of the standard re inappropriate advantage, [or] change the standard to provide for a disclose-and-manage approach.”

    Standard 3 placed a ban on all conflicts of interest or duty. There has been a backlash against the code, and confusion over whether the ban covers certain types of remuneration, such as the lucrative “stamping” fees for LICs and IPOs. Following-on, FASEA attempted to clarify that the government wasn’t looking to ban forms of remuneration not already outlawed. Nevertheless, the financial advice industry remains confused and concerned. As a result, FASEA asked for feedback before amending Standard 3.  

    Industry bodies have all labelled Standard 3 as “unworkable.” The AFA’s submission was in strong opposition of Standard 3 in its current form and says it is not practical. The FPA too, agrees that the prohibition to act when a conflict of interest occurs, will likely cause ongoing problems. One suggestion was to revert to the original 2018 wording.

    According to reports, the options FASEA is consulting on include:

    From 1 January 2022, a Financial Services and Credit Panel (FSCP) takes over from FASEA to  become the industry’s new single disciplinary body, to police the Code of Ethics. It will be closely watching the outcome from FASEA’s consultation process.

    Print Article

    A great way to play the booming natural gas market

    Longreach taps into the LNG market supported by projects in Texas & Oklahoma.

    Ishan Dan | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    ASIC levy review targets adviser ‘time-lag’ issue

    The review will consider “the consequences of time lags between regulatory action and cost allocation”, the terms of reference states.

    Tahn Sharpe | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    AMP Advice to ‘break even’ by 2024 as losses soften

    The institutional provider’s AUM and profit lines stayed red in 1H22, but positive signs emerged.

    Tahn Sharpe | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    Advisers urged to tread carefully with ‘wholesale investor’ status
    Staff Writer | 28th Jul 2022 | More
    Top hedge fund award goes to L1 Capital
    Greg Bright | 13th Dec 2021 | More
    MAX Award winners and the new world outside
    Greg Bright | 13th Jun 2022 | More
    INDepth with Andrew Lockhart from Metrics Credit Partners
    The Inside Adviser | 30th Jun 2022 | More
    Quality of advice review focused on advisers, not consumers
    Drew Meredith | 11th Jul 2022 | More