Home / ESG / Australian Ethical dumps Lendlease over koala habitat concerns

Australian Ethical dumps Lendlease over koala habitat concerns

The ethical money manager says Lendlease failed to provide information required to independently assess the impact of its planned development in Mt Gilead, an area deemed critical to the survival of a resident koala colony.
ESG

Investment manager Australian Ethical has drawn a line in the sand and divested out of Lendlease Group, after its concerns around the listed property behemoth’s plan to develop land for housing in Western Sydney will negatively impact koala habitats.

The ethical investment group recently announced it has sold its debt and equity positions in the Lendlease Group and its related vehicles, and will sell its stake in Lendlease’s Australian Prime Property Fund (Retail) at the first available opportunity.

Australian Ethical’s discontent stems from Lendlease’s failure to provide information required to independently assess the impact of its planned development in Mt Gilead, an area which the Office of the NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer (OSCE) says is critical to the survival of a resident koala colony.

  • Australian Ethical had previously used its stake in Lendlease to try and move the needle with the property group on its plans, and in 2022 put out a public statement urging the NSW government and Lendlease to be transparent about the planned width of habitat corridors for the koala colony in Mt Gilead.

    Despite the NSW government’s own environmental protection agency, the Environment and Heritage Group, finding that the existing Lendlease proposal for the land didn’t meet the OSCE’s recommendations, the property firm failed to provide the requested information.

    “For over four years we have used our shareholdings in Lendlease to encourage it to strengthen koala protections,” stated Amanda Richman, ethical stewardship lead at Australian Ethical. “But Australian Ethical cannot continue to support a company that appears to be failing to take biodiversity protection seriously”.

    Eventually, and in line with its own ethical charter, Australian Ethical decided to pull the pin on its relationship with Lendlease.

    “We’ve made it clear that we would continue to advocate until we had exhausted all avenues with Lendlease to improve koala protections and/or until there was no prospect of changing their mind through engagement,” a company statement read. “We have now reached that point.”

    Tahn Sharpe

    Tahn is former managing editor across The Inside Network's three publications.




    Print Article

    Related
    Head-to-head: ESG integration versus ‘impact investing’

    ESG integration and ‘Impact investing’ are often seen as similar, but there are crucial differences that must be well-understood before two approaches can be compared.

    Nick Hatzis | 1st May 2025 | More
    Harnessing the power of improvement on the ESG continuum

    In an era of volatility and heightened societal that influence the sentiment toward sustainable investing, Grace Su, Portfolio Manager at ClearBridge Investments, offered a refreshing and grounded perspective during her fireside chat at the Investment Leaders Forum INAUS, held in Byron Bay. What emerged from her discussion was a firm belief in the enduring relevance of ESG—not as a marketing label or a fashionable acronym, but as a lens for identifying value and driving long-term performance.

    Laurence Parker-Brown | 28th Apr 2025 | More
    ‘Pivotal moment’ as greenwashing overtakes returns as key ESG concern

    Amidst a healthy uptick in investment returns and consumer confidence, the ESG sector is coming to grips with increasing concern about greenwashing, which has now become the major deterrent for investors – up from 45 per cent in 2022 to 52 per cent today.

    Tahn Sharpe | 21st Nov 2024 | More
    Popular
  • Popular posts: