Home / ESG / Australian Ethical dumps Lendlease over koala habitat concerns

Australian Ethical dumps Lendlease over koala habitat concerns

The ethical money manager says Lendlease failed to provide information required to independently assess the impact of its planned development in Mt Gilead, an area deemed critical to the survival of a resident koala colony.
ESG

Investment manager Australian Ethical has drawn a line in the sand and divested out of Lendlease Group, after its concerns around the listed property behemoth’s plan to develop land for housing in Western Sydney will negatively impact koala habitats.

The ethical investment group recently announced it has sold its debt and equity positions in the Lendlease Group and its related vehicles, and will sell its stake in Lendlease’s Australian Prime Property Fund (Retail) at the first available opportunity.

Australian Ethical’s discontent stems from Lendlease’s failure to provide information required to independently assess the impact of its planned development in Mt Gilead, an area which the Office of the NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer (OSCE) says is critical to the survival of a resident koala colony.

  • Australian Ethical had previously used its stake in Lendlease to try and move the needle with the property group on its plans, and in 2022 put out a public statement urging the NSW government and Lendlease to be transparent about the planned width of habitat corridors for the koala colony in Mt Gilead.

    Despite the NSW government’s own environmental protection agency, the Environment and Heritage Group, finding that the existing Lendlease proposal for the land didn’t meet the OSCE’s recommendations, the property firm failed to provide the requested information.

    “For over four years we have used our shareholdings in Lendlease to encourage it to strengthen koala protections,” stated Amanda Richman, ethical stewardship lead at Australian Ethical. “But Australian Ethical cannot continue to support a company that appears to be failing to take biodiversity protection seriously”.

    Eventually, and in line with its own ethical charter, Australian Ethical decided to pull the pin on its relationship with Lendlease.

    “We’ve made it clear that we would continue to advocate until we had exhausted all avenues with Lendlease to improve koala protections and/or until there was no prospect of changing their mind through engagement,” a company statement read. “We have now reached that point.”

    Tahn Sharpe

    Tahn is managing editor across The Inside Network's three publications.




    Print Article

    Related
    Can banks… be good? Why ethical investors don’t automatically shun the big financials

    The banks may not be perfect, but their collective role in facilitating a developed ecosystem, combined with the leverage they have through lending and capital allocation, means they often fall within Australian Ethical’s “investible universe”.

    Staff Writer | 18th Apr 2024 | More
    Surging equity markets highlight importance of valuation discipline: Australian Ethical

    An elevated market is a good thing, but investors that take a valuation mindset into asset allocation need to be wary of what that means for prices. “Chasing momentum” is a real danger, says Australian Ethical’s Mark Williams.

    Staff Writer | 7th Mar 2024 | More
    Difficult conditions suit small caps, active management: Atchison

    Australia may not have the Magnificent Seven tech stocks, but a heavy top end on the ASX means concentration risk is just as present, Atchison’s says. According to Australian Ethical, that puts the domestic small companies sector right in frame for investors.

    Drew Meredith | 22nd Feb 2024 | More
    Popular
  • Popular posts: