Home / ESG / Why we don’t invest in Afterpay: Australian Ethical

Why we don’t invest in Afterpay: Australian Ethical

The ethical investment house believes consumer credit can be positive for society if it is used to buy useful items. But companies like Afterpay focus on impulse purchases that are more likely to push vulnerable Australians into financial over commitment.

Lay-by has been available to Australian shoppers for decades. Spot the perfect dress on sale for a 50 per cent discount but don’t have the cash? Easy! Put it aside on lay-by, pay it off over two or more instalments and then take it home after you make the final payment. ‘Buy now pay later’ is lay-by with a twist: instead of waiting until you’ve made the final payment, you can take the dress home right now! Better yet, companies like Afterpay and zipMoney will lend you money interest free.

Buy now pay later providers have taken off in the past two years, with the number of customers jumping from 400,000 in 2016 to 2 million in 2018, according to a recent report by the corporate regulator ASIC. During the same period, transactions have gone from 80,000 to 1.9 million and the number of stores offering the service has gone up a staggering 45 times. These services are particularly attractive to younger Australians who either don’t have a credit card or don’t want one. According to ASIC, almost two-thirds of customers (60 per cent) are aged between 18 and 34. Two-fifths (40 per cent) of buy now pay later customers are students or work part time, and the same number earn less than $40,000.

In order to comply with our Australian Ethical Charter we must avoid any investment which is considered to unnecessarily entice people into financial over-commitment. Looking at the buy now pay later industry as a whole, ASIC found there was a “real risk” that some of the arrangements can increase the amount of debt held by customers and contribute to financial over-commitment. ASIC says financial overcommitment can cause consumers to miss repayments, suffer financial stress and experience difficulty affording essential goods and services. Overall, ASIC found one-in-six buy now pay later customers (more than 300,000 people) had experienced at least one of the following negative impacts: an overdrawn bank account; delayed bill payments; or being forced to borrow additional money from family members or a loan provider.

  • One of the appealing aspects of Afterpay is that it lends money interest-free. So what’s the catch for consumers? And if the service is interest-free, how does Afterpay make money? Part of the answer is late fees. If you miss a payment with Afterpay you’re charged a $10 fee. If you still haven’t made your repayment one week later Afterpay will charge you an additional $7 late fee. This process repeats four times, so the total late fee can be a maximum of $68 per transaction (that $60 dress is suddenly looking a lot more expensive!). If that’s not enough, on top of the late fees you’re likely to be hit with a dishonour fee from your bank.

    In the 2017-18 financial year late fees accounted for 25 per cent of Afterpay’s $117 million in revenue. The remaining 75 per cent was generated by merchant fees, which are typically 4-6 per cent of the purchased item’s value (on top of a flat fee of 30 cents per item). What does that mean in practice? When you make a purchase using Afterpay, they pay the merchant somewhere between 94 per cent and 96 per cent of the item’s value. You then repay Afterpay 100 per cent of the purchase price over four fortnightly instalments. From Australian Ethical’s perspective, one of the problems with Afterpay’s business model is that its borrowers do not bear the cost of the credit. Instead, the cost is borne by all purchasers through Afterpay’s merchant fees. In other words, a clothing store that allows customers to use Afterpay will increase its prices to recoup the merchant fee. But the increased prices are paid by all customers, whether they use Afterpay or not!

    It is true that other forms of consumer credit share some of the negative features of Afterpay. But when taken together, these issues are enough of a concern that Afterpay does not pass our Australian Ethical Charter.

    Australian Ethical

    Difficult conditions suit small caps, active management: Atchison

    Australia may not have the Magnificent Seven tech stocks, but a heavy top end on the ASX means concentration risk is just as present, Atchison’s says. According to Australian Ethical, that puts the domestic small companies sector right in frame for investors.

    Drew Meredith | 22nd Feb 2024 | More
    Environmental reporting taking precedence over cybersecurity concerns: Perennial

    The pressure of meeting a spaghetti-like network of reporting standards has forced company executives to de-prioritise cybersecurity in favour of meeting global greenhouse gas emission targets, according to Perennial.

    Staff Writer | 12th Feb 2024 | More
    Australian Ethical zeroes in on energy transition with new infrastructure debt fund

    Australian Ethical’s partner in the new fund, Infradebt, is an ubiquitous presence in Australia’s energy transition movement, having funded 40 renewable projects to date.

    Staff Writer | 6th Feb 2024 | More
  • Popular posts: