Home / Markets / The answer to the Magnificent Seven’s ‘really difficult investment problem’

The answer to the Magnificent Seven’s ‘really difficult investment problem’

A huge benefit has already been realised in the price of the Magnificent Seven and it might be time to take some risk off the table instead of speculating on future fundamentals, according to Lazard.
Markets

It’s pretty rare to see the equity market rise 30 per cent in one year, and any investor that’s stayed in the Magnificent Seven stocks (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia and Tesla) has been richly rewarded.

But that’s almost all on expectations, Lazard global listed infrastructure portfolio manager Warryn Robertson told The Inside Network’s Equities and Growth Symposium – except for Nvidia, which is growing earnings at an astonishing rate.

“But for the other six it’s all in expectations of future earnings because their actual earnings didn’t really do that much; it’s all been multiple rewriting,” Robertson said.

  • That doesn’t detract from their performance; it’s a “great achievement”, and their investors have been richly rewarded. But now it’s time to make the true investment decision, Robertson said.

    “Do you bet on black and roll the dice? Or do you take the expectations of those future earnings at some time in the deep, dark distant future and capitalise that by putting it in something today?”

    Generally speaking, the Magnificent Seven have an amazing earnings outlook, but they’re a “really difficult investment problem to solve” – the poster child of which is Tesla.

    “I don’t think anybody can tell you what it’s worth in 10 years’ time because I don’t think Elon knows what it’s going to be in 10 years’ time,” Robertson said.  

    So investors can try and solve that problem – and potentially get it wrong –  or get paid today by investing in listed infrastructure stocks like National Grid or Transurban, where the variability around their earnings in 10 years’ time is much tighter.

    “My job – all day, every day – is to forecast earnings and put a multiple on it and come up with a valuation,”  Robertson said. “If you can find a group of businesses that are much easier to predict the cashflows of you’re more likely to get that valuation problem right.”

    “So I’d encourage you to be brave and take some of the profits you’ve made out of the Magnificent Seven and reallocate them into much more surer, short-term cashflow generative assets today where you’re much clearer on what they look like in a decade.”

    Staff Writer




    Print Article

    Related
    Passive funds don’t hurt markets, but some thematics might suffer: GMO

    The index-hugging wall of money can’t break the maths of the market, a new paper argues, but it may exacerbate the “long winter” of small caps and value stocks.

    David Chaplin | 22nd Jul 2024 | More
    Why healthcare has done relatively well in the commercial property convulsion

    As Australian healthcare expenditure continues to rise and investors move deeper into the sector, healthcare property is well placed to continue its outperformance of other commercial property sub-sectors.

    Staff Writer | 1st Jul 2024 | More
    Portfolios are (still) missing real diversification and downside protection

    The private markets have surged in popularity as investors hunt for a potent combination of yield and downside protection. But in a big selloff, the strategy that will do best is one that’s genuinely uncorrelated.

    Staff Writer | 24th Jun 2024 | More
    Popular
  • Popular posts: