Home / Intel / ETF Spreads are the Real Killer

ETF Spreads are the Real Killer

How does ETF investing go seriously wrong? If you don't pay attention to ETF buy-sell spreads, the advantage of low MERs can evaporate.
Intel

How does ETF investing go seriously wrong? Just try trading them during a choppy month, like March 2020.
According to the latest Best ETFs Australia, our free website which analyses and provides coverage of every ETF currently available in Australia, the average buy-sell spreads on ETFs during April 2020 was 0.51%.
The buy-sell spread is the invisible cost of investing in a managed fund, mFund or ETF. It’s paid each time an investor enters or exits a fund and covers the costs incurred by the market maker or fund provider.

Watch those ETF spreads

Here’s where the spread conversation gets interesting…
In March 2020, a month of significant volatility on the ASX and global financial markets, the average buy-sell spread for Australian ETFs was an incredible 0.85%! Keep in mind, these vehicles are supposed to be investing in the most liquid asset classes.
By far, the worst sector was commodities, with an average buy-sell spread of 1.46% — for an asset class that doesn’t pay any dividends/distributions, it’s even more important to be choosey.
The three best commodities ETFs, in terms of buy-sell spreads during March, were as follows:

  1. GOLD ETF by ETF Securities – 0.14%
  2. PMGOLD ETF by Perth Mint – 0.28%
  3. QAU ETF by BetaShares – 0.28%

The worst commodities ETF was the synthetic agriculture fund QAG ETF which had a buy-sell spread of 3.84%.
One thing to note is that the average ETF spread, at 0.85%, is considerably higher than the yearly average management expense ratio (MER) of 0.49%. In other words, if your holding period is less than a year forget about the MER debate — focus on the spreads.
As you might expect, the tightest spreads were from ETFs in the cash (0.04%) and currencies (0.32%) sectors.
Australian bonds, a typically defensive asset class, had average spreads of 0.77%. That compares to an average fee load of 0.27%. The bond ETFs with the widest spreads during March were VanEck’s subordinated debt SUBD ETF, at 2.84%, and the Russell RCB ETF at 1.44%, another corporate bond ETF.

  • Size matters… a lot

    At Best ETFs Australia, typically, our baseline rule of thumb is to draw a line in the sand at $100 million of funds under management (FUM) before an ETF receives our highest rating.
    If we slice and dice the ASX list of ETFs to include only those ETFs with $100 million invested, the spread data changes considerably.
    If I do this, the average buy-sell spread for an ETF with at least $100 million invested drops to just 0.34% in March 2020. Unsurprisingly, the average fee load on those ETFs also falls, from 0.49% to 0.43%.
    Of course, you could have just avoided the ETF market altogether in March 2020 but it’s during times of uncertainty when most advisers, clients and investors feel compelled to do something.
    While we acknowledge it’s a crude way to cut up the data, the next time you feel the need to rebalance or invest in ETFs during heightened market uncertainty — remember to narrow your range to focus only on proven ETFs with at least $100 million invested.
    Search the full list of ASX ETFs and access free reports.
    Owen Raszkiewicz is the founder of Best ETFs Australia, a division of The Rask Group. Disclosure: at the time of publishing, Owen Raszkiewicz does not have a financial interest in any of the companies or products mentioned.




    Print Article

    Related
    A great way to play the booming natural gas market

    Longreach taps into the LNG market supported by projects in Texas & Oklahoma.

    Ishan Dan | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    ASIC levy review targets adviser ‘time-lag’ issue

    The review will consider “the consequences of time lags between regulatory action and cost allocation”, the terms of reference states.

    Tahn Sharpe | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    AMP Advice to ‘break even’ by 2024 as losses soften

    The institutional provider’s AUM and profit lines stayed red in 1H22, but positive signs emerged.

    Tahn Sharpe | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    Popular
    1
    Advisers urged to tread carefully with ‘wholesale investor’ status
    Staff Writer | 28th Jul 2022 | More
    2
    Top hedge fund award goes to L1 Capital
    Greg Bright | 13th Dec 2021 | More
    3
    MAX Award winners and the new world outside
    Greg Bright | 13th Jun 2022 | More
    4
    INDepth with Andrew Lockhart from Metrics Credit Partners
    The Inside Adviser | 30th Jun 2022 | More
    5
    Quality of advice review focused on advisers, not consumers
    Drew Meredith | 11th Jul 2022 | More