Home / Legislation / Better Advice Bill changes enter consultation

Better Advice Bill changes enter consultation


Exposure draft legislation for the long-awaited Better Advice Bill was released this week, with advisers gaining greater certainty into the future of the industry.

The legislation marks the end of the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority, or FASEA, with ASIC itself set to take over from 1 January 2022 when the law is expected to apply.

Leading the headlines from the release was a significant increase in the cost of sitting the FASEA exam, which currently sits at $540 plus GST. Under ASIC, the cost will increase to $948, while the cost of a review of its marking will be $218.

  • Advisers who have failed the exam twice before 31 December this year will have another nine months to resit the exam, with the extension to 30 September formalised. Similarly, the three-month waiting period will be removed for those who need a resit before the end of 2021.

    Among the other key announcements was more certainty around when and for what matters ASIC will be required to convene a Financial Services and Credit Panel (FSCP), being the new Single Disciplinary Body. According to the proposal, this will include when:

    • An adviser becomes insolvent under administration;
    • An adviser is convicted of fraud;
    • An adviser is no longer considered a “fit and proper person” to be providing advice to retail clients;
    • The relevant provider had at least twice refused or failed to give effect to a determination made by AFCA;
    • Relevant providers have not met training requirements;
    • Relevant providers breached the requirements of an SOA as laid out in the Corporations Act;
    • They were unregistered and providing advice.

    The ‘seriousness’ and referral of any matters continues to rely on the definition that it caused material loss or damage to a client. 

    The legislation also simplifies the overlap that had occurred with breaches of the Code of Ethics, which themselves require advisers to abide by all relevant laws.

    The government notes that “If breaches of the Code of Ethics were included in the breach reporting regime, then all breaches of a financial services law, no matter how minor, would have been reportable by virtue of a breach of the Code of Ethics being a restricted civil penalty provision.” 

    Staff Writer

    Print Article

    The 6 ways policymakers can fix advice in the 2024/25 budget: FAAA

    The collation of issues is an important marker for how many areas of advice legislation still need improvement for the industry to thrive, with fairness at the heart of all the proposals put forward by the association.

    Tahn Sharpe | 5th Feb 2024 | More
    Super tax break costs misrepresented: Mercer

    The idea that superannuation tax concessions are costing the government more than the Age Pension is based on bad analysis, according to Mercer, which found that concessions will actually save taxpayers in the long run.

    Lisa Uhlman | 31st Aug 2023 | More
    Review into ASIC funding model recommends levy discount cut and… another review

    While finding that more research is needed to determine if the “definitions, metrics and formulas” used to calculate levies remain fit‑for‑purpose, Treasury was able to determine that advisers should no longer benefit from discounted levies.

    Tahn Sharpe | 29th Jun 2023 | More
  • Popular posts: