Home / In Practice / Another step forward for the simplification of advice regulation

Another step forward for the simplification of advice regulation

In Practice

The Federal Government has quietly passed several previously flagged changes to the financial advice industry. The majority appear to be a positive step in the face of what is a jungle of red tape currently faced by the shrinking cohort of financial advisers.

  • There were four key changes, with all eyes on the potential for a move from licensees needing to register advisers, to advisers being responsible for their own registration.

    The first change was confirmation that the Financial Services and Credit Panel within ASIC would finally become the “single disciplinary body” flagged in the Royal Commission. The intention of this being to “ensure that less serious misconduct does not go unaddressed” and ultimately open-up a broader range of actions to ASIC beyond the banning of advisers.

    The second change follows on from this, being the introduction of ASIC’s ability to reprimand, seek enforceable undertakings or issue infringement notices for any breaches of the Corporations Act.

    One of the most significant areas of simplification was the registration of Tax Financial Advisers with both the Tax Practitioners Board and ASIC. The legislation will remove the need to be registered with both and move regulation and regulation solely to ASIC’s purview.

    As highlighted throughout the week, FASEA is being formally disbanded with the standards- and exam-setting roles being moved over to ASIC. In a positive news for those advisers struggling to pass the Ethics exam, the deadline will be extended unto 30 September 2022 but only for those who have sat and failed the exam twice before the end of 2021.

    The final and less expected change was the bill paving the way for the individual, rather than licensee, registration of advisers. According to the FPA, this is set to begin from 2023 once the Financial Adviser Register has been shifted to the Australian Tax Office. They also note that for the immediate future advisers will need to be registered with the single disciplinary body by their AFSL.

    The Inside Adviser


    Related
    FSG exemption ‘almost entirely redundant’: Lawyer

    For advisers that have already started relying on website disclosure, the unclear legislation “may or may not” be an issue, the Cowell Clarke lawyer explained. Whatever approach advisers are currently taking, they should all be paying attention when the regulator releases its guide next month.

    Tahn Sharpe | 14th Oct 2024 | More
    What is the real value of managed accounts in an advice practice?

    Managed accounts may be just “one lever of many” that advisers can use to increase scalability in their practice, but the advantages they offer to both clients and advisers make them a crucial consideration.

    Tahn Sharpe | 10th Oct 2024 | More
    QAR fork in the road: Does your advice practice take a compliance or strategic approach?

    An advice group can either shift its compliance settings to accommodate the reforms, or they can reshape their business strategy to take advantage of them. The different paths could lead to a bifurcated industry when all’s said and done.

    Tahn Sharpe | 26th Sep 2024 | More
    Popular
  • Popular posts: