Home / Legislation / FASEA to be disbanded, exam still required

FASEA to be disbanded, exam still required


2021 may be shaping up as the ‘Year of the Financial Adviser’. After what has been a tumultuous and stressful few years for the industry, promises of a more streamlined regulatory framework may finally be coming to fruition.

Assistant Minster for Superannuation and Financial Services, Jane Hume, and Treasurer Josh Frydenberg had a business day on Wednesday, releasing draft legislation of two significant changes to the financial advice industry. Both have their foundations in the recommendations of the Hayne Royal Commission, but you could be excused if you heard a collective sigh of relief from the industry on Thursday.

What was the announcement?

  • The Australian Federal Government, under the tireless work of Minister Hume, have released draft legislation that will disband the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA), moving it is ‘standard’ setting role to the Treasury and passing responsibility for the adviser examination and registration requirements to ASIC. ASIC will therefore become the ‘single disciplinary body’ that has been flagged for many years.

    There have been many reports of a flood of accountants and advisers leaving the industry, either selling their businesses or dropping their financial adviser registration, and whilst this move will do little to change that, it at least reduces the number of reporting bodies. According to the proposal, the FASEA Exam an Education Requirements will still need to be met by the current deadlines.

    Likely the biggest change, is that the ‘Standards’ which came under significant scrutiny due to their complexity and in some cases confusing explanations, will be administered by Treasury via a ‘legislative instrument’. This may lead to a re-writing and simplification of their content.

    ‘Independence’ definition

    It did not end at FASEA for the busy Coalition Government, who announced changes to both the Opt In and Fee Disclosure Requirements, we wrote about these here, and pushing forward with the disclosure requirements for those wanting to call themselves ‘independent’.

    According to reports, the proposal will legislate the requirement for financial advisers across Australia to disclose whether they receive commissions or volume-based benefits and restrict the use of independent to those who don’t. The specifics have not been released, however, it has been suggested that those who receive commissions for providing insurance advice, regardless of their size, will be included. Many industry insiders are suggesting it could extend to include those charging percentage based asset management fees or managed account fees, but will need to await the specific wording to confirm this.

    Print Article

    A great way to play the booming natural gas market

    Longreach taps into the LNG market supported by projects in Texas & Oklahoma.

    Ishan Dan | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    ASIC levy review targets adviser ‘time-lag’ issue

    The review will consider “the consequences of time lags between regulatory action and cost allocation”, the terms of reference states.

    Tahn Sharpe | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    AMP Advice to ‘break even’ by 2024 as losses soften

    The institutional provider’s AUM and profit lines stayed red in 1H22, but positive signs emerged.

    Tahn Sharpe | 11th Aug 2022 | More
    Advisers urged to tread carefully with ‘wholesale investor’ status
    Staff Writer | 28th Jul 2022 | More
    Top hedge fund award goes to L1 Capital
    Greg Bright | 13th Dec 2021 | More
    MAX Award winners and the new world outside
    Greg Bright | 13th Jun 2022 | More
    INDepth with Andrew Lockhart from Metrics Credit Partners
    The Inside Adviser | 30th Jun 2022 | More
    Quality of advice review focused on advisers, not consumers
    Drew Meredith | 11th Jul 2022 | More