Home / ESG / ESG a ‘substance-less concept’ and AI will reduce profitability: New York academic

ESG a ‘substance-less concept’ and AI will reduce profitability: New York academic

ESG is the "emptiest" idea, according to Aswath Damodaran, while AI will morph into higher costs for companies overall with no competitive advantage in a world where the technology is ubiquitous.
ESG

As an epitaph for ESG it doesn’t get much pithier than the last words doled out by US valuation expert, Aswath Damodaran, to a NZ CFA Society conference late in May.

“Born in sanctimony, nurtured with hypocrisy and sold with sophistry,” Damodaran (pictured) told the CFA crowd via video. “If you ever bury ESG, I hope those words go on that tombstone.”

The noted New York University finance professor slammed ESG as a “substance-less concept” that was marketed first as a proxy for “goodness” before being rebranded as a source of alpha, then a risk metric and “now as a measure of disclosure”.

  • “People who claim to measure ESG have no idea of what they are measuring,” Damodaran said. “Because of that it is the emptiest concept.”

    But the scathing assessment of ESG came after a wide-ranging talk on fundamental company valuation techniques that also touched on another abbreviated hyper-trend, AI – or artificial intelligence.

    “When all is said and done, AI is going to make companies less profitable, not more profitable,” he said.

    Bar the minority of firms selling AI products, Damodaran said the new buzzword would simply morph into higher costs for companies overall with no competitive advantage in a world where the technology is ubiquitous.

    “If everybody has AI, then nobody will have AI,” he said.

    Such skepticism is in short supply, however, in a market going gaga over anything AI-related, which reinforced his broader theme of the losing art of valuation. Damodaran said the reliance on ever-increasing petabytes of data and analytical tools has swamped a more nuanced, sense-based approach to valuing companies.

    “We have a lot more data than we did 40 years ago, we have far more powerful tools but in my view the quality of valuations now is worse than 40 years ago,” he said. “We see that in every aspect of life, numbers replacing the capacity to read what’s happening… it gives us a false sense of precision, a false sense of security… AI is going to make that worse.”

    While data remain important, Damodaran said valuation also requires analysts to judge the probabilities of corporate narratives playing out over time.

    “Good valuations are bridges between stories and numbers,” he told the CFA crowd.

    For example, showcasing his blend of literary criticism and spreadsheet finesse, Damodaran knocked out a valuation for NZX favourite, Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, at just under $8 compared to current on-market price of $27.

    “It is possible that I have been shoddy and made a fundamental error or missed a key element of the company’s story,” he said. “So, what am I missing?”

    Essentially, people tend to be narrative- or number-oriented, Damodaran said, with the latter group tending to be the most dogmatic in his university valuation courses.

    “I always have more trouble with number-crunchers,” he said. “You give me a hundred history majors and I can teach them everything they need to know… to value a company in 24 hours. You give me a hundred engineers, I’m completely screwed because they’ve spent their whole lifetime bludgeoning their imagination into the ground.”

    Damodaran himself is a reformed numbers-man after an early encounter with university-grade Moby Dick analysis turned him off stories. Deep into an in-class discussion, he asked “when are we going to talk about the whale?”.

    “I remember the instructor saying there is no whale… she said it’s a metaphor… Coming out of the class I came to the singular conclusion that never again am I going to subject myself to that kind of bullshit,” Damodaran said.

    To recap Moby Dick, everyone dies except the whale and the narrator, Ishmael, who ends the tale: “And I only am escaped alone to tell thee.”

    This article originally appeared on Investment News NZ.

    David Chaplin

    David Chaplin is publisher of Investment News NZ. David is a reputed financial services journalist with over 15 years' experience covering the investment, superannuation and advice industries in both Australia and New Zealand. In addition to publishing the weekly editions of Investment News, David contributes to several publications on a freelance basis.




    Print Article

    Related
    Can banks… be good? Why ethical investors don’t automatically shun the big financials

    The banks may not be perfect, but their collective role in facilitating a developed ecosystem, combined with the leverage they have through lending and capital allocation, means they often fall within Australian Ethical’s “investible universe”.

    Staff Writer | 18th Apr 2024 | More
    Surging equity markets highlight importance of valuation discipline: Australian Ethical

    An elevated market is a good thing, but investors that take a valuation mindset into asset allocation need to be wary of what that means for prices. “Chasing momentum” is a real danger, says Australian Ethical’s Mark Williams.

    Staff Writer | 7th Mar 2024 | More
    Difficult conditions suit small caps, active management: Atchison

    Australia may not have the Magnificent Seven tech stocks, but a heavy top end on the ASX means concentration risk is just as present, Atchison’s says. According to Australian Ethical, that puts the domestic small companies sector right in frame for investors.

    Drew Meredith | 22nd Feb 2024 | More
    Popular
  • Popular posts: