GARP index gives advisers a new frame for offshore equity exposure

With so many client portfolios having a healthy allocation of domestic stocks, many advisers are seeking to offer great levels of exposure to global growth assets. With markets close to all-time highs, the next challenge becomes achieving growth without abandoning valuation discipline.

Enter the S&P World Ex-Australia GARP Index as a portfolio construction tool to reconcile these goals. The index, launched in August 2024, applies a growth-at-a-reasonable-price framework to developed-market equities outside Australia. It starts with the S&P World Ex-Australia Index, screens for growth, quality and value, and arrives at 250 constituents across more than 20 developed markets.

A portfolio construction answer to home bias

Australian portfolios remain structurally tilted to domestic banks, miners and income stocks, while many clients still need broader offshore exposure.

S&P DJI modelling shows a hypothetical portfolio combining 90 per cent S&P World Ex-Australia GARP Index with 10 per cent S&P/ASX 200 delivered 374 basis points of additional annual return over a 100 per cent domestic allocation, while cutting volatility by 173 basis points.

Jason Ye, Senior Director, Factors and Dividends at S&P Dow Jones Indices, said the methodology deliberately begins with growth before applying valuation and quality controls.

“The index name is ‘growth at a reasonable price’, which indicates that growth comes first. The objective is to first look at a group of growth stocks, then within that group, we look at valuation and quality considerations.”

The first screen ranks companies by a composite growth score using three-year earnings-per-share growth and three-year sales-per-share growth. Jason said the three-year period was chosen for methodological consistency, rather than because it was uniquely predictive.

“There’s no magic behind the three-year window,” he said. “It’s a common practice following how we construct style indices like the S&P 500 Growth or the S&P/ASX 200 Growth. Intuitively, one year might be too short and five years might be too long.”

“We also did some stress tests using slightly different growth measures, or even using the forward-looking sell-side consensus growth measures, which didn’t materially affect the backtest result,” Jason  added.

After the growth screen, the index applies a composite quality and value score using financial leverage, return on equity and earnings-to-price. The result is an index with a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio than the benchmark, 19.6 times versus 24.0 times, alongside stronger profitability and lower long-term debt.

Growth first, price second

That is the crux of the proposition for advisers. Global growth exposure, but with a filter designed potentially to avoid excessive valuation or poor fundamental quality.

Jason  said the contribution of the three secondary factors varies over time.

“It kind of depends on which period you look at, as these three factors have their own performance cycles,” he said. “Leverage and ROE tend to bemore quality-focused, while E/P tends to be more valuation-focused.”

The index weights stocks by float market capitalisation multiplied by growth score, subject to stock and sector caps. He  said this was important in a global index. Pure growth-score weighting could push the portfolio too far from the benchmark.

“Using pure growth weighting would result in something leaning towards equal weight, which would likely result in underweight against the US market,” he said. “Also, when designing a cross-market index, having the float market cap element is helpful in managing the level of deviation against the underlying benchmark, or the tracking error.”

The caveats advisers need to explain

The long-run numbers are strong but need careful framing. S&P DJI index data from July 2004 to February 2026 shows the S&P World Ex-Australia GARP Index outperforming its benchmark by 3.61 percentage points per year.

Across every 10-year rolling window in that period, the outperformance was consistent, a 100 per cent hit rate. But the index itself only launched in August 2024, meaning most of the performance record is backtested.

There are also practical considerations. The briefing notes average annual one-way turnover of around 60 per cent. This means implementation costs, tax drag and product fees will matter.

Looking at the ETF tracking the S&P World ex-Australia GARP Index since inception, the annualized performance difference is about 30 bps. This reflects the impact from the fees and indirect costs. Currency is another live decision, with the index exposed mainly to the US dollar, euro and yen. The hedged version outperformed over one year but lagged over five years, underscoring that hedging is not a free lunch.

Nor is the index defensive. S&P DJI’s data shows it has tended to do better in rising markets. However, it still delivered modest average excess returns in down markets. Jason  said the pro-cyclical bias is inherent in the design.

“The growth element,” he said, when asked what explains that behaviour. “If it’s pure quality or pure value, then the strategy would tend to be more defensive in nature, but the index construction starts with a growth universe, so that would make it more pro-cyclical.”

Reconciling these features within a broader portfolio, perhaps the index is most plausible as a core-adjacent global equity sleeve rather than as a defensive substitute. The pitch is not that growth at a reasonable price removes equity risk. It is that it gives clients a cleaner way to own offshore growth, filtered for quality, valuation and index discipline.