Home / In Practice / AFCA confirms a new user pays model to cover costs

AFCA confirms a new user pays model to cover costs

Simplified, fairer model set to begin on 1 July
Following on from last week's article titled, 'Ombudsman seeks to simplify complaint treatment,' The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) today confirmed it will put into place a 'user-pays' funding model that is fair, transparent and equitable.
In Practice

Following on from last week’s article titled, ‘Ombudsman seeks to simplify complaint treatment,’ The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) today confirmed it will put into place a ‘user-pays’ funding model that is fair, transparent and equitable.

The AFCA board approved the new funding model that will effectively charge financial advisory firms the same or a lower fee, from 1 July this year.

The new fee model will include a single registration fee, a simplified complaints fee structure and five free complaints a year.

  •  “Under the new model, which includes a single registration fee, around 90 per cent of members of the national ombudsman scheme will see a positive or neutral impact on total fees, while the remaining 10 per cent are expected to see an increase in costs which AFCA said this more accurately and fairly reflects their usage.”

    All members will receive five free complaints per year. AFCA will charge an external dispute resolution scheme annual registration fee, of $375.55 for the coming financial year. The superannuation levy has been removed and super funds have been brought under the same fee structure as other scheme members.

    The vast majority of financial advice firms will pay the above fee, whilst a small number of heavy impact firms will pay a fee that is adjusted to reflect volume. No fee would be charged for complaints found outside of AFCA’s jurisdiction and the five annual free complaints would be excluded when AFCA calculated the user charge for frequent users of the service. There would also be a single registration fee and simplified complaint fee structure.

    Feedback for the fee model has been mainly positive. AFCA consulted with peak bodies and members to finalise an appropriate fee model that covers costs.

    Ishan Dan

    Ishan is an experienced journalist covering The Inside Investor and The Insider Adviser publications.




    Print Article

    Related
    FSG exemption ‘almost entirely redundant’: Lawyer

    For advisers that have already started relying on website disclosure, the unclear legislation “may or may not” be an issue, the Cowell Clarke lawyer explained. Whatever approach advisers are currently taking, they should all be paying attention when the regulator releases its guide next month.

    Tahn Sharpe | 14th Oct 2024 | More
    What is the real value of managed accounts in an advice practice?

    Managed accounts may be just “one lever of many” that advisers can use to increase scalability in their practice, but the advantages they offer to both clients and advisers make them a crucial consideration.

    Tahn Sharpe | 10th Oct 2024 | More
    QAR fork in the road: Does your advice practice take a compliance or strategic approach?

    An advice group can either shift its compliance settings to accommodate the reforms, or they can reshape their business strategy to take advantage of them. The different paths could lead to a bifurcated industry when all’s said and done.

    Tahn Sharpe | 26th Sep 2024 | More
    Popular
  • Popular posts: